Talk:ZB vz. 26

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ZB vz. 26 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	World War II task force

The title

What about moving the article to vz. 26? The current title ("ZB vz. 26") is a hybrid of the manufacturer's (ZB-26, the ZB stands for Zbrojovka Brno) and Czechoslovak army's designation (LK vz. 26, meaning lehký kulomet vz. 26, in English light machinegun mk. 26). Anyone who would oppose? :) --- Sandius 13:36, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you're able to change all links directing to ZB vz. 26, I believe it should be useful change.--ja_62 14:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"ZB vz. 26" is indeed a hybrid designation, yet it seems that it still qualifies under the wp:COMMONNAME. -87.249.145.69 (talk) 18:44, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, but the statement "Many more countries imported or produced the design under license, including the USSR, China, Yugoslavia, and Lithuania." is not correct. Soviet Army had never adopted or imported or produced this machine gun. A few of them were captured in Baltic countries (may be in Lithuania), and used during 1941-1942 in some People's Militia Divisions. Of course, some MG.26(t) were captured as war loot by Red Army soldiers and Soviet partisans. Alexandr Pavlov. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.189.151.16 (talk) 16:40, 29 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the number of errors in this wiki entry is amazing. Examples

The ZB26 influenced the design of the FM24/29. This of course is moronic in that the FM24 was in service before the ZB26 was even designed so how could it influence the design?

The Jap 96 and 97 is a copy of the Bren. First the 97 is a Lewis gun copy and the 96 is a Hotchkiss derived design and was before the Bren.

ZB30 is a design for the English trials. No again it was the next iteration of the design and the ZB33 was the trials gun for the English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.194.112.73 (talk) 17:24, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Elite German Waffen SS

I Deleted the "elite" Part of this because it sounds silly and they were everything but not elite — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dennis Könemann (talk • contribs) 18:39, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ZB vz 26 in Croatia

@Havsjö: Are you sure the guns on the "countless photographs" were zv. 26 and not ZB vz. 30J?--Le Petit Chat (talk) 12:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]